Find out what your insurance company doesn't want you to know! Request your free report!

Guess Who Now Owns Your Home??

The startling headline in the news recently read: 'Supreme Court Rules
Cities May Seize Homes.'

Huh? How can this be? Isn’t one of the main principles of America the idea that ownership of your own property is self evident and secure? Guess not any more.

The news article further states: "Cities may bulldoze people's homes to make way for shopping malls or other private development, a divided Supreme Court ruled, giving local governments broad power to seize private property to generate tax revenue.

In a scathing dissent, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said, “The decision bowed to the rich and powerful at the expense of middle-class Americans." Four of the five normally considered more “liberal” justices who voted for this travesty, (my choice of words) were joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee who supposedly is (was) a 'conservative.' (Although I’m not sure what this means any more. The judges now vote so unpredictably, one has a hard time placing them in any political category such as “liberal” or “conservative”.)

The Chairman of the Sovereign Society, Jack Pugsley, writing in the July 2005 issue of the newsletter, ‘The Sovereign Individual’, wrote:

    "Those of us at The Sovereign Society agree that the right of property is fundamental to civilization. In fact, the central tenet of our credo is that every individual has the natural right to keep, control, and dispose of his or her justly acquired property."

Pugsley went on to quote, William Howard Taft, 27th US president who said:

    "Next to the right of liberty, the right of property is the most important individual right guaranteed by the Constitution and the one which, united with that of personal liberty, has contributed more to the growth of civilization than any other institution established by the human race."

Pugsley added this (and sadly he was right):

    "However, Taft was wrong saying the Constitution guarantees citizens’ right to property. The 5th Amendment states that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Thus property is not sacrosanct. Your property is safe unless legislators decide someone else needs it more than you do."

And now the US Supreme Court has said just that. Public use supersedes private property. (Wow, I can’t believe I just wrote that…and it’s the law of the land.)

In effect, the Court has placed above the right to private property the politicians who operate at a level of government well known for corruption; and highly susceptible to the wishes of builders and developers who dole out political donations and jobs.

This ruling turns American history and tradition on its head. Alexis de Tocqueville in "Democracy in America" (1835/1840) said of property rights: "Why is it that in America, the land par excellence of democracy, no one makes that outcry against property in general that echoes through Europe?" His answer: "It is because there are no proletarians in America. Everyone, having some possession to defend, recognizes the right to property in principle."

Over the last two centuries many American politicians have tried to make private property an object of scorn, even contending that owning property does not rise to the level of a civil right. Now five judges have ignored history and basic human rights. A full 70% of US residents own or are buying their own homes -- and now they are all in danger of government confiscation at the whim of politicians.

Now some people say we get “too worked up” over new laws that take away the very foundations of American democracy and freedom, as we often do in this newsletter. They say, “You’re going overboard. The government wouldn’t get that bad. After all, this IS America. Just because they do things to some people, doesn’t mean they’ll do it to everyone.”

Whenever someone says that I have to ask, “Are you SURE that YOUR home won’t be next? Are you SURE that your family won’t be the next victim of these anti-American laws that Congress keeps passing or that get voted in by judges?” Everyone assumes that these nightmares won’t affect them until they do affect them…and then they wonder, “How did this ever happen?”

Basically, I don’t care if some people think all this tinkering with the basic rights of the United States Constitution is “alright”. My standard is if any law would make Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin roll over in their graves…then the law sucks. And I KNOW that this loss of personal property law would definitely make our forefathers sick as dogs.

In truth, private property serves as the basis for all liberty, since without personal economic power, a job, a home, wealth, the individual cannot support himself or his or her family, and is far more prone to government control -- just as many politicians and now judges love to have it. If ever there was a case to be made for a constitutional amendment to overturn a Supreme Court decision, this is it.

If you haven't started your financial planning for '05, DO IT NOW! Don't delay. Call us up for your annual review, RIGHT NOW, while this is fresh on your mind. We'll take care of the rest! (Don't forget, we know where to find you!) REMEMBER- WE WANT YOU TO CONTACT US WITH YOUR "HERE'S WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT DOING QUESTIONS", NOT YOUR "GUESS WHAT WE JUST DID!" COMMENTS!


Did You Know…
(Our monthly feature of tidbits of news and info to make your life easier, your money work harder and so you’re healthy all the time!)

1.) Process for getting a driver's license will get more complicated-Homeland Security officials say the Real ID Act, which the Senate approved recently, is a step forward. It would make it more difficult for illegal immigrants to obtain identification. The federal government will recognize when they try to board an airplane, fill out tax forms, or open a bank account. But the measure would affect U.S. citizens as well. Americans would need an authentic copy of their birth certificate to apply for a new driver's license or renew an old one. The certificates must be verified at the counter of the Department of Motor Vehicles, along with other identification, such as Social Security numbers and utility bills. Governors and officials in motor vehicle departments oppose the act which would lead to long lines at the DMV. States would not be required to comply with the legislation, but their residents would pay a price if they did not. They probably would be turned away when they tried to enter airport gates unless they had other identification such as a passport. (President Bush signed the Act on May 11.) Illegal immigrants would still be able to obtain documents that allow them to drive, but the papers would bear a stamp, or color code, showing that they should be used solely for that purpose and not as identification. The National Conference of State Legislatures said that complying with the new regulations within three years, as the measure requires, would cost states $500 million to $700 million. Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.), the measure's sponsor, said the cost is closer to $100 million.

2.) Put a tiger in your tank... In the future, your computer will organize files for you. You'll be able to find anything, and find it fast. But is the future now? The new Apple Mac OS X, called Tiger, features a powerful search feature called Spotlight. Spotlight is search extreme. It updates immediately and in real time, indexing not just filenames, but contents of a file and file type, presenting and sorting files instantly as you type keywords. According to The New York Times, the feature "is an enhancement so deep, convenient, and powerful, it threatens to reduce the 20-year-old Mac/Windows system of nested folders to irrelevance." Meanwhile iChatAV lets you have a full-screen voice and video chat with anyone, anywhere in the world who is connected to the internet and uses Tiger. Up to 10 people can chat at any time on the system that employs almost eerie, movie effects graphics.

3.) New 'blink' credit cards don't have to be swiped…Credit card companies are urging merchants to set up machines that will allow their new credit cards to be waved or passed in front the units. J.P. Morgan Chase is issuing millions of new cards that can be waved. It's the first bank to issue Visa- and MasterCard-branded cards with the technology called "blink." Chase serves more than 90 million credit card holders. American Express has joined in. It will issue its "ExpressPay" version of the technology to new customers. Both cards contain a special chip that is recognized by the merchant's terminal. When consumers pass the card in front of the machine, the reader lights up and beeps to signal that the transaction has been authorized. An agreement has been reached on a standard that enables all of the readers to accept any card that is equipped with the chip.

Development of the "contactless" payment is the biggest technological advance for credit cards since magnetic strips were embedded in cards about 30 years ago. The new method doesn't require a signature. Customers have become comfortable with not signing when they order online and at gas stations. Not signing also saves time. According to The Wall Street Journal, the new card is more secure because it never leaves the holder's hand. The cards have encrypted software that prevents duplication and data theft.


Client News And Tidbits!

Here are the new clients that became members of our firm’s family this last month! We’d like to welcome you publicly, and wish you all the best!

Welcome To New Clients And Thank You For Referring!
  • Rudy Fraraccio, Sarasota
  • Ruth Joelson, Nokomis
  • Tom Difiore, Esq., Tampa, Referred by Michael Eschevarria, Esq. Thank you, Mike!
  • William “Bill” Leyden, Osprey
  • Al Wilson, Sarasota

We love giving recognition to our new friends and our wonderful existing clients who are kind enough to refer their friends and relatives to us! We’re all helping each other, which is the whole point of all this! Right?


Health Tip Of The Month…

Keep Your Heart Healthy Now To Prevent Alzheimer's Disease In Later Life.

(These tips are not for everybody and should not be taken as specific recommendations. Before you take any action regarding yours or anyone’s health, we strongly suggest you consult a qualified physician!)

Maybe it was inevitable that scientists would find that almost every late-life condition is linked to how we live our lives for decades before. But they are surprised at how the link between heart health and Alzheimer's disease has emerged.

Neuropsychiatrists at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine say it appears that reducing your risk of heart attack or stroke also helps to keep oxygen-rich and nutrient-rich blood pumping into your brain. Brain cells can then stay healthy and keep areas of the brain from withering. Withering causes symptoms of Alzheimer's disease such as memory loss, disorientation, and erratic behavior.

Some experts say the buildup of plaques in the arteries of cardiovascular patients is similar to the buildup of plaque in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease. The new discoveries provide hope that the strategies used to prevent heart attack and stroke can also prevent Alzheimers.

Their advice:

  • Control blood pressure. Keep it at 120/80 or less, whether by diet, exercise, weight loss, or taking drugs. A Swedish study shows that lowering blood pressure with medication significantly reduces the risk of Alzheimer's.
  • Prevent or control type 2 diabetes. Diabetes damages blood vessels, which reduces blood flow to the brain.
  • Maintaining a healthy weight is important.
  • Fight bad cholesterol. Studies show elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL) may contribute to beta-amyloid plaques that are typical of Alzheimer's. Increase good cholesterol with diet and aerobic exercise. People with the highest levels of HDL are far less likely to get Alzheimer's.
  • Eat well. Get plenty of antioxidants, B vitamins, and folic acid. Eat fruits, vegetables, and dairy products. Buy whole grain bread, rice, and pasta. Get healthy fats from nuts, seeds, fish, and olive oil.

Financial Tip Of The Month…

It's OK To Shop For A Car Loan Or Mortgage… Many Inquiries Won't Harm A Credit Score…

Did you hear about the guy who was denied a low-interest rate mortgage because he had looked at rates on many Internet sites and each site checked his credit? Lenders thought that so many credit checks indicated that he had financial problems. Authorities at Fair Isaac say that such multiple inquiries shouldn't be a problem today because multiple credit checks are handled differently now.

Previously, the credit-scoring model recognized that consumers shop for the best interest rates before buying a house or car. Their searching results in many lenders requesting their credit reports. To compensate for this, multiple auto or mortgage inquiries in any 14-day period were counted as one inquiry. Now, their new formula to calculate FICO scores has been expanded from 14 days to a 45-day period. That means consumers can shop around for an auto or home loan for up to 45 days without affecting their scores. (Some lenders might not yet use the new version.)

The latest FICO version went online in late 2004 at all three credit agencies, TransUnion, Equifax, and Experien.
Other factors in the new version

  • The FICO score ignores all mortgage and auto inquiries made in the 30 days before scoring.
  • The score doesn't count requests for your credit report or credit score that are made in order to offer you a "pre-approved" credit card offer.

Factors that could negatively affect your score:

  • Taking several months to shop for a new mortgage or car loan.
  • Shopping around in the same year for several lines of credit not associated with a mortgage or car loan.
  • Shopping for lines of credit when a score shows they barely qualify for credit they already have.

Please keep in mind that this tip is designed to be of help for you, but is not to be relied upon as advice. It is merely a reminder that there are many choices you have available to you, and that planning is the only way to find the right answers for your situation! As with any financial issues, make sure you get the right information before making a decision! If you have any questions, we’ll be glad to help you!

SUCCESS STORY OF THE MONTH!

(Note: The details of these stories have been changed to maintain confidentiality, and some compilations are used to accomplish anonymity.)

“Pearls are the product of pain, precious tiny jewels conceived through irritation, born of adversities, nursed by adjustment!” ~ Anonymous ~

Janie Married Martin. She Also Married Norman. At The Same Time! Here's Martin's Story...

As awful as it was, Martin can sum up his recent nightmare with his wife Janie in a few words... Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what's inside.

Okay, so he stole a line from Forrest Gump, but after he got some good help from a psychologist and an empathetic divorce attorney we referred him to, Martin is finally starting to get over the blow he took when he found out his wife was a bigamist!

That's right! When Martin was frantically searching for his last year's tax returns in order to do this year's, he found what he was looking for. But there were two of them! One joint return was for he and his wife Janie. And underneath the bureau drawer, he found another return that also was for his wife Janie… but with another guy named Norman!

In disbelief, he knew there had to be some mistake! He didn't know any "Norman". His name was never "Norman". His kids names weren't "Norman". Who in the hell was Norman?

Martin’s mind raced and his blood pulsed, waiting for Janie to come home from her business trip out of town. He didn’t want to confront her with this on the phone or in an email. See, Janie traveled all the time in her job as an auditor for an accounting consulting firm. She was on the road three or more weeks a month. Or, at least that’s what Norman thought Janie was doing.

Then Martin thought, “She must have made a mistake with the returns. She had never done drugs, so maybe she was really tired or incoherent or something when she filed them? Was she in a witness protection program, who's former husband's name was Norman? How on earth could there be two returns? Again and again, who in the hell was Norman?”

Finally, a couple days later when Janie was due back from the road, she didn't even have time to get out of her car, as Martin raced down the driveway and pounded on her window to make her roll it down. With a frantic look, she asked, "What is wrong? Is the house on fire or something?"

"No, the house isn't on fire. But you can put out the fire that's raging inside of me as soon as you can explain who Norman is! And it better be good!"

That's when the shock of his life hit Martin. Without a shed of remorse or guilt, Janie told him that she had fallen in love with another man who was a client in the city her firm’s headquarters was located, and to where she traveled all the time. Janie married him. That was it. That was her story. She was sorry she hadn't told him, but that was the truth, and she wished things hadn't ended up like this. Janie said she planned on divorcing Martin for quite a while now, and married Norman not telling him that she was married to Martin. She didn’t think it was worth it to “mess up” the finances of both marriages.

Martin was devastated. Not only hadn't he ever had any reason to suspect Janie not being faithful, but he actually thought they had a great marriage. He was humiliated, hurt, betrayed, angry all at the same time. Martin’s life had suddenly turned into a soap opera people would think was made up. But…it was real. Very real.

Seeing as he didn't know who else to call, in hysteria and confusion he called us. We had helped Martin over the years helping him in his business financial planning. Now we were asked to help him figure out his huge personal mess too! Which was fine, but we couldn't do it alone. He was going to obviously need some financial help, as well as psychological help, and a good divorce lawyer. He wanted Janie out of his life, but that didn't necessarily mean he was going to give her everything they had accumulated over the years.

To make a very long story short, Martin, Janie and Norman ended up in a messy court fight. The court eventually ruled in Martin's favor, and the divorce was granted. Janie's still married to Norman. Norman was shocked when the news was revealed to him, but he said he loved her so much that, “this little issue should never come between them”. (Wow. It really does take all kinds, I guess.)

Martin came to our office again, showing us what the court had granted him. Going through countless questions with him, we helped Martin came up with a good, solid plan, for his new future. The lawyer had set up the legal structure to protect him as much as possible, and we prepared a financial plan that set forth various options and choices he was faced with...so he could rationally make decisions as to what was going to be best for him and the kids. (Their kids were in his custody, and he also wanted to make sure we set up a plan to help pay for their college tuitions.)

After carefully considering the options we showed him, he proceeded to shuffle around some of his assets, including their house. The equity in the house was really a joint asset, and although Martin wanted to get back at Jamie, he ultimately decided to sell it, and give her half of the equity. (He said while he hated her for what she did, he felt she should get half of the money they had made in the house.)

Even though Martin insisted on giving up half of the house for personal reasons, it helped him make that decision, when our plan showed him how he could give half of the proceeds to Janie, and re-worked some of his other assets to buy a nice new house for him and the kids to start their new life in. His mortgage payments ended up being about the same. (We showed him some legal tax and investment strategies to help him save several hundred dollars a month, which he didn't have before, that covered all the shortfall in his monthly budget caused by giving away half of the equity in their former residence!)

When all was said and done, despite the incredible blow he took from his wife, and the loss he suffered from losing someone he had built his life around, we think Martin's going to be OK. His financial future is a lot brighter than he thought during those dark days after the discovery of Janie's deceit. While he was knocked over by the emotional trauma of the betrayal, he was also confronted with thoughts and worries about all of the money and financial issues that such a devastating marital split causes.

This story, while a bit bizarre and unusual, clearly illustrates just how much of a curve ball life can throw at us...and how we have to be able to adapt, cope and change.

So, what about you? How certain are you that your finances are as solid as they can be? If you are interested in learning more about how you can save money in taxes, or other expenses you might be overpaying for...or want to sit down with us and develop or update a financial plan so you will be prepared if your financial life changes, give us a call! We're here to help you, and to help you keep on track with your planning. Don't be a stranger. Call us, and we'll assist you in having the best shot possible of reaching your goals, and having peace of mind! Don't wait until it's too late!

Client Quiz!

Here’s The July 2005 Quiz Questions And Answers!

Q. The government cannot attack IRA's and other qualified retirement plans to pay for long term care in a nursing home. True or False?

A. False. All of your retirement savings can be forced into liquidation to pay for long term care. Almost no assets are protected. There are some loopholes, but you must have a competent advisory team work to structure the right ways to protect your assets. There are many strategies to do so; but they must be addressed in the context of a complete financial review!

Now Here’s The August 2005 Quiz Question

Q. Which of the following would never affect your credit score?

1. You order a credit report for yourself.
2. A non-mortgage lender pulls your credit report.
3. You get a new credit card but don't use it.
4. None of the above.
5. Credit report requests always affect your credit score


If you would like any additional free reports, or would like some of your friends, co-workers, relatives, business acquaintances, etc. to receive a FREE subscription to this newsletter, please fill out the info on the reply form, and we’ll add them to the mailing list.

We’ll also send them a note with their first issue telling them that you had suggested they receive the newsletter, and to contact us if they would like to stop at any time. If you enjoy this newsletter, why not share it for FREE with people you know, with no hassle for you!


Home · What we do · The Insurance Review System™ · Testimonials
Credentials · The Premium Recovery System™ · Due Diligence for Advisors
Please contact us · At The Helm · Free Report · Links of interest

Copyright © 2005 John Helms All Rights Reserved
Expert Insurance Planning for Florida
Tampa · Sarasota · Bradenton · Venice · Fort Myers · Naples
Website design and maintenance by
Unified Graphic Design, LLC